The nuanced impact of AI we should not overlook

February 4, 2025

AI tends to be accompanied by grandiose claims of 10x productivity increases. I think a more nuanced understanding of AI’s impact reveals a complex landscape of incremental improvements and shifting paradigms across various roles in our space.

Setting expectations for AI in product development

In my opinion (sorry AI dreamers), AI won’t 10x developers’ productivity (yet). While AI tools certainly offer assistance, their impact is more likely to result in modest improvements, potentially increasing efficiency by one to two times. This doesn’t mean AI is not awesome, it means there is a more nuanced paradigm shift in how we work with explosive consequences.

AI’s broader impact across tech roles.

The influence of AI touches various roles within the tech ecosystem.

A few examples:

Developers: ~2x their skills. Front-end devs get help with the back-end, security and scaling, while beck-end devs can suddenly create beautiful CSS. Full-stack developers might finally become real.
Product Managers: AI enables the creation of working prototypes alongside user stories and features, enhancing communication with development teams.
UI Designers: Access to AI-generated data allows for more realistic and data-driven design processes. And they can create a working version of a design. AI accelerates rapid prototyping, generates creative design suggestions, and provides deep user behaviour insights
DevOps Teams: AI facilitates automated deployment, intelligent infrastructure management, and dynamic performance optimization QA: AI drives automated testing, predicts potential software bugs, and intelligently generates test cases.

Blurring of specializations

One of the most significant impacts of AI is the gradual erosion of strict specializations within tech roles. As AI tools make it easier to understand and implement various aspects of development, we’re witnessing a shift towards a more holistic, full-stack approach. This trend is democratizing knowledge and fostering a more versatile workforce. The integration of AI is catalyzing a maturing process within the tech industry. As professionals gain broader knowledge across different areas.

Having more overview offers the following benefits:

Decision-making improves due to a more comprehensive understanding of systems.
Argumentation becomes more effective, leading to better-quality outcomes.
Innovation accelerates as teams become less constrained by processes and learning curves.

Conclusion

While AI may not deliver 10x developers (yet), its impact on the tech industry is nonetheless huge. By facilitating knowledge sharing, breaking down silos, and creating a more holistic approach to development, AI is enabeling a more mature tech ecosystem. As the field evolves, the ability to adapt, learn, and effectively communicate will become an increasingly valuable skill for tech professionals.

Jump on the bandwagon now or be left behind, I guess…

On this page

Frequently asked questions

How does AI affect different tech roles?

AI impacts various roles differently: developers can expand their skills, product managers can create working prototypes, UI designers can access AI-generated data for more realistic designs, DevOps teams can automate deployments, and QA can leverage AI for automated testing and bug prediction

What is the 'blurring of specializations' mentioned in the article?

The article describes how AI tools are making it easier to understand and implement various aspects of development, leading to a more holistic, full-stack approach and eroding strict specializations within tech roles

What benefits does the article suggest come from having a more comprehensive overview of systems?

The article states that a broader knowledge across different areas leads to improved decision-making, more effective argumentation, and accelerated innovation due to fewer constraints from processes and learning curves

Jul 24, 20268 min read

The biggest risk to AI is the enterprise org chart

This article argues that the real risk of corporate AI is not rogue superintelligence but how large organizations deploy it, usually in service of cost-cutting rather than creating new value. Big enterprises buy AI like office furniture, wrapped in committees, procurement, and risk matrices, so it ends up optimizing ticket deflection and headcount instead of enabling innovation. The real bottleneck is bureaucracy, not intelligence. In contrast, a roughly 500-person company has enough depth to build serious systems but short enough communication paths that the person with the problem can help build the solution. AI lets domain experts prototype directly, shortening the loop between friction and fix. The key is governance that enables safe experimentation instead of vetoing it, using AI to expand reach rather than just reduce costs.

Composable architecture
AI engineering
Frontend

Jun 22, 20265 min read

Your LinkedIn reads like a robot wrote it

Two free skills can strip the AI tells out of your writing in seconds. Nobody uses them. So every feed is now a slop fest of em dashes, rule-of-three lists, and It's not just X, it's Y. Here is how to spot the patterns and stop shipping them.

AI engineering
Craft
Product strategy

Mar 17, 20267 min read

We moved the difficulty. We didn't make it disappear.

In 2013 I built the Need for Speed Rivals launch site from scratch in five weeks - custom router, custom state, custom tweening engine, 35 languages, no framework worth mentioning. I rebuilt it recently for my Vue.js Amsterdam 2026 talk. The contrast broke my brain in the best way, and it clarified something I've been trying to articulate about AI, abstraction, and what "craft" actually means now.

Composable architecture
AI engineering
Frontend